How We Review an Online Casino, Step by Step
Every page about Arlequin comes out of one method: read what the casino publishes about itself, compare it with older archived versions of the same pages, follow the links it offers, and do the sums its promotions leave to the player. The method has four steps, and each page says which of them a figure came from.
- Primary evidence
- The casino’s own terms, bonus terms, promotion, VIP, loyalty, responsible-gaming and contact pages
- Independent check
- The licence seal followed to the regulator’s own validator,
- Second evidence
- Archived copies of the same pages, quoted with their date
- Score
- Transparency, 15 criteria, 10 / 5 / 0 per criterion
- Audience
- Adults aged 18 or over
Step 1: Read the Casino’s Own Pages
The first source is always the casino. For Arlequin that means the general terms, the general bonus terms, the welcome offer, the VIP Club and loyalty pages, the responsible-gaming page and the contact page. A figure is copied in the shape the page gives it: a €10 minimum deposit, a €5 maximum bet with bonus funds, withdrawals capped at €2,500 a week and €10,000 a month, a wire transfer from €50 inside the EU or €250 elsewhere, and a €5 monthly fee on an account left dormant for six months.
The terms name who stands behind the brand. They give the operator as Boni Tech Ltd, incorporated in Saint Lucia with registration number 2023-00614 at 10 Manoel Street, Castries, and the licence as Tobique Gaming Commission number 0000018, issued on . The same terms name Stardust Global CCS Ltd., a Cyprus company with registration HE 443351 in Larnaca, as merchant of record.
Step 2: Compare Today’s Terms with Older Copies
A casino’s page shows only its current version. Public archives keep dated copies, and reading them side by side shows what changed and when. That matters, because a review copied from an old page can quote an offer that no longer exists.
| Document | Dated copies read | What they are read for |
|---|---|---|
| General terms | September 2025, November 2025, March 2026 | Operator, licence, withdrawal caps and the restricted-country list |
| General bonus terms | September 2025, December 2025, May 2026 | The bet cap, the expiry periods and the excluded countries |
| Promotions page | September 2025, November 2025, February 2026, May 2026 | Which offers were running, and under which names |
Older figures are printed only as history and always with their date. Payment methods are a special case: the casino shows them nowhere in words. Seven logos sit in the footer — Visa, CASHlib, SEPA, MiFinity, bank transfer and two crypto marks — and no page states a fee, a limit or a timing for any of them, so none is quoted here as a rule.
Step 3: Do the Arithmetic the Pages Leave Out
This casino states no wagering multiple at all on its welcome match: the bonus is wager-free, and winnings above the bonus amount go to the cash balance. What it does leave to the player is the loyalty maths, where one line of the table decides how long a level takes.
| Loyalty level | Points asked | Slot bets at 1 point per €30 | Live or table bets at 1 point per €300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colombine | 5,000 | €150,000 | €1,500,000 |
| Pantalone | 20,000 | €600,000 | €6,000,000 |
| Docteur | 50,000 | €1,500,000 | €15,000,000 |
| Arlequin | 100,000 | €3,000,000 | €30,000,000 |
Two rules change what those sums are worth. Only bets placed after a deposit earn points: spins paid for by free spins, bonuses or cashback earn none. And the weekly cashback is capped at €500, which the formula reaches at €5,000 of deposits minus withdrawals minus bonuses in a week.
Step 4: Follow the Links the Casino Offers
The last step is the cheapest and it is the one reviews skip: open what the casino links to. The licence seal in the footer leads to the regulator’s own validator, and on it returned a valid status for the casino’s domain, naming Boni Tech Limited and its Saint Lucia address. The Limits link in the same footer returned the casino’s error page the same day. Both results are checks a reader can repeat in a minute.
Review catalogues are a fifth, weaker source, and on this casino they are not used for figures at all. Nothing on these pages rests on a catalogue: every number here comes from a page the casino publishes or from a check described above.
The Transparency Score, Criterion by Criterion
The score on the front page grades disclosure, not the casino. The engine computes it from a dossier of what Arlequin publishes, not from an opinion. Each of the 15 criteria scores 10 for a complete published answer, 5 for a partial one or one the casino leaves out, and 0 when the dossier is empty on it or the casino’s pages contradict each other. Criteria carry different weights, and licence status in the register weighs the most.
| Group | Criterion |
|---|---|
| Licence and trust | Licence status in the register |
| Licence and trust | Licence number quoted and linkable |
| Licence and trust | Operating company named in the terms |
| Licence and trust | Restricted countries published |
| Money and access | Bonus wagering and expiry published |
| Money and access | Withdrawal timings published |
| Money and access | Withdrawal minimum published |
| Money and access | Payment methods listed |
| Money and access | Identity-check trigger described |
| Money and access | Mobile access documented |
| Support and player protection | VIP levels and their limits published |
| Support and player protection | Support channels and hours published |
| Support and player protection | Responsible-gambling tools described |
| Support and player protection | Complaint route and dispute body named |
| Support and player protection | Terms dated, with a change-notice period |
The number moves when the dossier changes, so no page repeats it in a sentence. A high score means the casino publishes a lot about itself, in plain terms.
How Support Hours and Our Own Checks Are Quoted
Two kinds of figure follow a fixed format on every page.
| Subject | How the pages quote it |
|---|---|
| Customer support | Hours and channels as the casino’s contact page lists them: live chat and email, 10:00 to 22:00, seven days a week |
| Our own checks | The date they were run, the address checked and the answer it gave, so a reader can repeat them |
What a Casino Page Here Will Not Say
Some sentences are ruled out by the method itself. A withdrawal timing is always the casino’s stated timing, and the licence is always quoted as the casino prints it. And no page tells a reader that playing is legal for them: that depends on where they live, so check your local law. The casino itself publishes a list of restricted countries in its terms, and that list is quoted on the page about whether the casino is legit.
Two rules from the casino’s own terms belong in every review because they can cost money. A withdrawal request cancels and resets the bonus balance, whatever is in it. And every deposit must be wagered at least once before any balance can be withdrawn — a condition that applies even where no bonus is involved.
Terms This Method Uses
- General terms
- The casino’s main contract with players, which it may change with advance notice and a fresh acceptance.
- Wager-free
- A bonus with no betting requirement; at this casino the bonus balance still cannot exceed the bonus amount, and a withdrawal request cancels it.
- Closed loop
- The rule that money goes back out to the account it came from, which this casino applies to every withdrawal.
- ADR provider
- An independent body that settles a dispute the casino could not; here the terms name EGIS - FZCO after two months without a result.
Recap: The Four Steps in Order
Read the casino’s own pages, compare them with dated archive copies, do the wagering sums in the open, and open what the casino links to, including the links that do not answer. Then say plainly where a figure is the casino’s own claim. Start with the Arlequin review, or go straight to the bonus terms worked through. Every page is signed by the tester whose method this is.
Deposits and identity checks happen on the casino’s own site, never on this one.